Ukraine
09 Aug 2021
Since May 2020, Global Rights Compliance (GRC) has been working to establish the facts of Russia’s involvement in Crimea and Donbas and assess them through the lens of international law. This project culminated in the development of an authoritative legal opinion that examines the applicable international legal framework and clarifies the nature of Russia’s role in both regions.
Even eight years after the initial intervention by the Russian Federation, Ukraine continues to struggle against widespread misinformation and legal ambiguity. While Russia’s occupation of Crimea is broadly acknowledged, there is less clarity on the legal implications of that occupation. In Donbas, Ukraine asserts that Russia exercises control via separatist forces, but international consensus remains elusive. No comprehensive analysis had previously assessed these claims through factual and legal scrutiny. The lack of authoritative legal interpretation has hindered Ukraine and its international partners in shaping informed policies and responses.
International Law and Defining Russia’s Involvement in Crimea and Donbas
An authoritative legal opinion (‘the Opinion’) concerning the international legal framework applicable to the situations in Crimea and Donbas is available here.
Conference Recording: “Neither Here Nor There: Life in Crimea and Donbas”
Conference Recording: “Neither Here Nor There: Life in Crimea and Donbas” (18 March 2021) – Featuring eyewitness accounts and testimonies from Ukrainian, Russian, and international human rights actors.
Conference Recording: “Legal (Un)Certainty of Occupation: Crimea and Donbas”
Conference Recording: “Legal (Un)Certainty of Occupation: Crimea and Donbas” (9–11 June 2021) – Featuring legal experts discussing IHL and IHRL applicability to the regions.
Blog post: Ukraine must address the legal ambiguity enabling Putin’s not-so-secret war
Blog post: Ukraine must address the legal ambiguity enabling Putin’s not-so-secret war (English)
Op-ed: International Criminal Court is no panacea for Ukraine
Op-ed: International Criminal Court is no panacea for Ukraine (English)
Podcast: Transitional justice is not just about bringing to responsibility but also about fairness
Podcast: Transitional justice is not just about bringing to responsibility but also about fairness (Ukrainian)
Article: The ECtHR in Georgia v. Russia – a farewell to arms? The effects of the Court’s judgement on the conflict in eastern Ukraine
Article: The ECtHR in Georgia v. Russia – a farewell to arms? The effects of the Court’s judgement on the conflict in eastern Ukraine (English)
The project “International Law and Defining Russia’s Involvement in Crimea and Donbas” is funded by the Swedish Ministry of Foreign Affairs. To collect information, GRC engaged with a broad range of the Ukrainian governmental and non-governmental organisations, as well as international human rights organisations including but not limited to Agora, Civic Assistance Committee, Crimean Human Rights Group, Human Rights Watch, International Partnership for Human Rights, Kharkiv Human Rights Group, Ukrainian Helsinki Human Rights Union, Vostok SOS, ZMINA.